tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11478816.post112767065481108050..comments2007-04-16T07:44:25.510-04:00End racismhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03298167946803783017noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11478816.post-1128757573815771062005-10-08T03:46:00.000-04:002005-10-08T03:46:00.000-04:00<B>jewish does not = Israeli</B><BR/>Perhaps, but "Israeli" means Jewish. At least for 99.99% of Jews. If you're not a Jew in "Israel", you're not "Israeli" per se. You're only a "citizen of Israel". That is why we hear time and time again "Israelis" vs Arab "Israelis" (and not Jewish "Israelis" vs Arab/Muslim "Israelis") and "Israelis" vs Arab citizens of "Israel".End racismhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03298167946803783017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11478816.post-1127864197253140432005-09-27T19:36:00.000-04:002005-09-27T19:36:00.000-04:00Ohh, a scientific mind we have here !!<BR/>BTW, jewish does not = Israeli dear marsden, unless you do not believe in the existence of Israel, then you should call it zionist, unless (again) you are an SSNP member, then you're off the hook.<BR/>cheers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11478816.post-1127824922549117152005-09-27T08:42:00.000-04:002005-09-27T08:42:00.000-04:001. Why exactly do they need to state a fact more than once?<BR/><BR/>2. And? Unless you're going to use that to arrive to a conclusion (i.e. that the Syrians/pro-Syrians were behind the assassination attempt), this claim (or "fact" as you like to call your claims) is irrelevant.<BR/><BR/>3. So if she IS indeed #2, why should anyone believe what an anti-Syrian says about receiving threats from... pro-Syrians? <BR/><BR/>4. No, I also mentioned Al Jazeera. In other words - if you're that thick-skulled, 2 Jewish and 2 goyim sources (since you see the world only in terms of Jewish/goyim ) .<BR/><BR/>5. My common sense tells me that it could be just about anyone. Unlike your common sense (sic), my common sense does not lead me to conclusions the second a bomb explodes. That May Chidiac was anti-Syrian does not - I repeat, does NOT - prove that the Syrians or pro-Syrians were behind the assassination attempt. It's possible that they did it, but I don't dismiss other possibilities (including Lebanese and other Arab sides - there is no united Arab stand, in case you were clueless....)...End racismhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03298167946803783017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11478816.post-1127778763226177012005-09-26T19:52:00.000-04:002005-09-26T19:52:00.000-04:001. they are stating the facts, LBC is anti-syrian.<BR/>2. May is anti-syrian.<BR/>3. she received threats on her life from pro-syrians (refer to VDL interview)<BR/>4. apart from BBC, the news sources you mentioned are israeli, would you expect them to accuse israel<BR/>5. what does your common sense tell you? you really think the syrians didn't do it? the castle of arabism can't go that low can it? :)<BR/><BR/>cheers mate.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com